Development Economics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Development Economics - Essay Example (Das 2001, p. 25) It is a disturbing phenomenon, which, in the wake of globalization, has been escalated into a full blown international crisis. Various studies point to several factors responsible for child labour. These include lack of education, poverty, insufficient legislation and, if there are in place, their poor enforcement, family background, culture, exploitation and backward technologies, among others. The economic factor in the problem seems to take the most responsibility as statistics and literature on the subject have shown - child labour is prevalent in low-income countries. Hence, we will examine the issue in this perspective. Basically child labour constitutes a market with its own buyers and sellers coming together where such labour is exchanged for a price and, therefore, subject to the laws of supply and demand. According to Sayan Chakrabarty, the market includes those who provide child labour, such as households the children live in, and those who utilize it and that together both sides influence the incidence of child labour – its amount and productivity. (p. 17) To quote: The more pressure exerted on the supply side (i.e. the more households offer child labor), the less productive and remunerated this labor will tend to be. The more pressure is exerted in the demand side (i.e. the more uses for child labor are generated), the more productive and remunerated it will be. (p. 18) The Basu-Van model examines the relationship of poverty to child labour more specifically. In this model, it is argued that labour markets in low income economies are often characterized by multiple equilibria. This means that there are several possibilities in its incidence. One possibility is the prevalence of low (adult) wages, which are not enough to feed a family, and in such situations parents are compelled to send their children to work. (p. 412-27) The labour market equilibrium in this case involves participation of

Discourse with an Atheist Who Beleives That Gos Does Not Exist Essay

Discourse with an Atheist Who Beleives That Gos Does Not Exist - Essay Example For instance, evolution does not explain the forces that combined the hydrogen and oxygen molecules and dust particles to form the primordial cell. Likewise, the causes and reacting elements that triggered the Big Bang or the star’s withdrawal of elements from the sun, as is alleged in the Star-Tidal theory are not cogently identified in non-creationist theories. Even non-creationist theories have to take a leap of faith in investigating the origin of life forms (Mongrain, 2011, 205). Contrary to the above, no one can repudiate the fact that the world, the universe and life forms are too complex to have been brought about by random chance. The intricate network of the blood vessels in mammals (especially man), the universal order and man’s linguistic capabilities, are just some of the indicators of an intelligent Being who must have designed the universe. Had the Star-Tidal or the Big Bang incident brought the universe and life forms into existence, chances for this str iking order would be zero (1/?). Logically, if God exists, then His interactions with His creation will be inevitable, and the vestiges of these interactions may also be notable. Still, these requirements are consistent with the Biblical notion of God’s existence. Particularly, there are indicators of the universal or the Noahic flood, just as the Bible alleges that the flood took place around 4,300 BC. For instance, the multiple sources and traditions of the worldwide deluge as is seen in the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Rig Veda and Ovid’s Metamorphosis and the Chinese’s Book of Knowledge, among others provide the Noahic flood with multiple attestations. Particularly, there are over 240 literature and traditions which mention the worldwide flood. The slight disparities among the accounts do not really discount the plausibility of a universal flood having taken place. Instead, the numerous accounts corroborate it. 2) A case for Jesus' claim to be God and for His resu rrection That Jesus claimed to be God is directly settled in many references. Some of these references include: Matthew 12:6-8 (He refers to Himself as the Initiator of the Sabbath); Mark 2:1, 2, 10 (He forgives sins); Matthew 7:21-23 (He is the ultimate Judge who can render eternal damnation); Mathew 14:33 and John 9:38 (He accepts worship). Conversely, Christ’s claim to be God is expressly seen in the instance where He takes up God’s name and therefore equating Himself with God, in John 8:23-4. In Exodus 3:12-14, God reveals Himself to Moses, with the name I AM. In His discourse with the Pharisees and the rest of the Jews, Jesus does not only claim to have preceded Abraham, but also takes on the name; I AM (Williams, 2010, 27). In Mark 2:1, 2 and 10, before healing a paralytic, Jesus speaks of having forgiven the young man’s sins. The Scribes and those gathered there charged (rightly) in their hearts that only God had the power to forgive sins. To validate His claim of having the power to forgive sins, Jesus heals the paralytic. The crux of the matter herein is that while it is easy for any one to claim to have the power to forgive sins, He healed the paralytic as proof to His ability to forgive sins. Logically, a man’s words just before his death are usually taken seriously, especially when the actor or speaker is aware that he is on the brink of death. At this instance, an individual weighs his words and deeds carefully because of the knowledge of the irreversible nature of death and the eternal state that